Kelly Mears

Tier List

A community-authored ordinal ranking of a game's options, and what the ranking actually measures.

Play & Games2 min read288 words9 out · 5 in
also calledTier RankingS-tierT0

A tier list is a community-authored ranking of a game's characters, weapons, decks or strategies into ordinal bands — S down through F is the standard letter scheme, and a numeric T0-and-up convention does the same job with less inherited folklore attached to the letters.

What a tier measures is narrower than it appears. A list looks like a ranking of general worth and is usually a ranking of ceiling within one mode, most often high-level competitive play. A pick can top the list for that context and still lose to a lower-tier one that counters it, or be unplayable below the skill level the list assumes. The list is accurate about what it measured and silent about the rest, which is most of how the game actually gets played.

Lists published days after a patch add a second problem: too little data, gathered from players still learning the change. Early results skew toward whatever is legible fast — a Truncation Bias toward the obvious pick — and get revised as play accumulates, but the first version is the one that circulates, and it anchors opinion regardless — the Anchoring Effect operating on a whole community at once.

The durable failure mode is reading "best in role" as "required" — an Exhaustive Claim the list never made. A ranking compares options against each other; a community reads S-tier as the input list and excludes everything else, which turns a description of the Metagame into its target, Goodhart's Law enforced by consensus rather than by a developer's numbers. The same reflex shows up wherever players compress a wide option space into a single ordered take, from Frame Data readings in fighting games to drop-spot advice in Battle Royale modes.

See also5

Hand-picked in the note itself — the neighbours worth reading next.

Linked from5

Notes elsewhere in the wiki that reach for this one.