Planned Obsolescence
designing or marketing a product for a shorter useful life than it could otherwise have.
Planned obsolescence is the practice of designing or marketing a product so its useful life is shorter than it could be, for reasons serving the seller rather than the owner. The term covers three distinct things run together in popular use, and separating them matters.
Genuine engineering compromise is not obsolescence at all: every product trades durability against cost, weight, or price, and a part built to outlast the rest of the assembly by a wide margin is usually a sign of over-engineering, not virtue. Psychological obsolescence is real and well documented — fashion cycles, seasonal releases, and styling changes that make a functional product feel outdated, driving replacement through desire rather than failure. Deliberate lifetime limitation — a component engineered to fail on a schedule — is the strongest and rarest claim, since it requires evidence of intent, not just a short lifespan.
The usual exhibit for the strong version is the Phoebus cartel: manufacturers of incandescent light bulbs agreed in the 1920s and 1930s to cap bulb life at around 1,000 hours and fined members whose bulbs lasted longer, an agreement established through surviving cartel records rather than inferred after the fact — one of the few cases where the Ground Truth of intent is documented at all. Even here the reading is contested: a 1951 UK Monopolies Commission inquiry rejected it, holding that a shorter-lived filament burns hotter and yields more light per watt, making 1,000 hours a defensible compromise between efficacy and lifetime. Nor is it the only documented case — Epson was prosecuted in France in 2018 over printer chips that declared cartridges and waste pads spent before they were. Most accusations of the same pattern — batteries, appliances, the general sense that things used to last — lack anything close to that standard, and are usually Plausible Mechanism doing the work a citation should: a short lifespan is consistent with a conspiracy story and equally consistent with ordinary wear, cost engineering, or the Survivorship Bias behind "they don't make them like they used to," which forgets every early appliance that already failed.
See also5
Hand-picked in the note itself — the neighbours worth reading next.
Right to Repair
the movement for consumer and independent-shop access to the parts, tools, and information needed to fix a device.
Meaning & Society13 connections
Ground Truth
The measurement that arbitrates, as opposed to the artifact that merely reports.
Method92 connections
Plausible Mechanism
A causal explanation that was inferred rather than tested, and reads as more rigorous for being specific.
Method61 connections
Survivorship Bias
Drawing conclusions from a sample already filtered by success.
Method12 connections
Exhaustive Claim
A statement of the form "the last one" or "nothing else does this" — load-bearing, and only as good as the search behind it.
Method23 connections
Related5
Nearby in the graph rather than deliberately chosen. Looser, sometimes surprising.
Linked from2
Notes elsewhere in the wiki that reach for this one.